Financial Inclusion and Poverty Reduction

2.0   CONCERNS ABOUT POVERTY  As we got ready to done first 1/2 regarding the decade regarding the 1990s, growing concerns about poverty stood out in political agendas all over the industrialized and the developing worlds within Zambia. The stubbornness of poverty, even within the richest of nations, is being met with increasing impatience, and governments of diverse ideological persuasions are trying to do something about it, while donors and other worldwide agencies have been rushed into offering their help to these efforts. This has even been hastened by the deepening global financial and economic crisis that is sweeping the entire globe.  But, from good intentions to actual successful remedies there is an extended way. Thus, most conceptualizers and practitioners are once repeatedly receiving note of for operational approaches to deal with poverty. And so, the old question of credit extension re-emerges which hinges on financial inclusion.  Financial inclusion plays a critical role in reducing poverty. But with this financial crisis blowing throughout the globe is financial inclusion possible? Cross sectional data have shown that people with access to credit have fewer incidence of poverty. As we well know, the extent to which the reduction of poverty and/or the alleviation of its consequences was an worldwide policy issue which has differed significantly throughout countries and over time. In Zambia, for example, poverty was at the top regarding the nation's agenda during the preparation of Poverty Reduction Strategy Cardboard which saw the place qualify to Highly Indebted Poor Countries Initiative program steered by the Worldwide Monetary Fund. One regarding the key issues thought about in this cardboard was access to credit.    Further, within the early 1980s, not only was poverty merely two of multiple explicit policy concerns, but many chose instead to highlight the counterproductive nature and high fiscal costs of some regarding the poverty alleviation programs that had been adopted earlier. More recently, as we move into the 1990s, public attention has focused repeatedly on the potential role of most government and regarding the publicly-supported non-government organizations (NGOs) in directly alleviating the continuing plight regarding the poor. 3 decades ago, as new programs were being introduced and old programs were being expanded, an optimistic view prevailed. The belief was that if stable economic growth should be maintained, government actions should actually solve the poverty difficulty if only sufficient resources were devoted to the task (Danziger and Weinberg). It is against this backdrop that some countries have return up with a deliberate vision of promoting sustainable financial service providers to the unbanked nationals with emphasis on the provisions of little interest rates. 3.0    FINANCIAL INCLUSION AND POVERTY Within the letter of transmittal regarding the 1964 Economic Report regarding the President, President Johnson announced: “We have knowledge of what should be done and this Nation of Abundance can surely afford to do it” (Johnson). Soon optimism was followed, however, by a diminishing faith within the government's ability to solve any difficulty (Aaron) and by tough arguments that corporate problems cannot be solved by “throwing cash at them.” This is one regarding the perceptions that led to promotion regarding the private sector, but together with the recent economic crisis, we have seen the USA Government increasingly receiving up its role that was negated to the private sector.  Despite this skepticism, within the 1990s the pendulum of public opinion was swinging return and new initiatives to address the challenge of poverty are being proposed. In general, between these recent initiatives, specialized credit programs for the poor are becoming increasingly well-known (Jordan; Minsky et al.). As many know that a more effective creation regarding the poverty alleviation programs should prevent their earlier shortcomings, it becomes critical to identify lessons learned from earlier experiments. What do we have knowledge of about more effective program designs? As skills development accumulates on the performance of credit (and of  Income from a country, Costa Rica, where these objectives of renewed growth with improved corporate conditions are being achieved barely successfully, and thus we are optimists about well-designed structural adjustment programs). Hence the need to encourage microfinance institutions such that many people shall have access to credit any time they need so. This is how financial inclusion should be promoted in poor countries.  There are legal requirements that a financial service provider wants to adhere to prior to a license is granted to an institution. However it is the deliberate policy of most central banks to relax little of these legal requirements so as to maximize the numbers regarding the players within the market, mostly those whose operational objectives is to give the unbanked. In this case, this shall positively affect one the fundamentals of economics, demand and supply. Once there exists more financial service providers, this shall subsequently increase competition, leading to fall in interest rates, the cost of money. Distant there is need to return up with other programs explicitly drafted to assist the poor, in this regard there is need to take stock of all antipoverty policies that have worked and which have not. We need complimentary policies that shall help on the promotion of financial inclusion. The Government should return in and return up with fiscal policies that shall lessen the hurdles that applicants in financial service face. The tax regime should be favorable to all players within the market whose objective is to give the poor people. In this case, in addition to encouraging formal financial service providers, the place shall promote informal players as well.  A substantial abode of skills development (positive and negative) on credit programs for the poor was accumulated in little income countries. Many regarding the lessons learned are relevant for any place wishing to pursue this deliberate policy. The evolution of public policy has not been different in other developing nations, where poverty is so conspicuous. Leaving behind the “basic needs” paradigm regarding the 1970s, for most regarding the developing world within the 1980s were a “decade of structural adjustment,” dominated by stabilization efforts drafted to bring local expenditure in line with local income (or output) as well as by attempts to increase local income, through policy reforms that have promoted a more efficient use of resources (Grootaert and Kanbur). There is a tough professional consensus that these adjustment programs regarding the 1980s were successful in moving many countries toward internal and external macroeconomic balance. Together with the attainment of this objective we need to avail all the credit resources that the poor desperate need. The debate is intense, however, about whether these objectives should have been achieved “while better protecting the poor and providing the basis to incorporate them within the growth process.” However, let it be emphasized that, this is not the location to solve this issue. To begin with, establishing causality between specific policies and the evolution regarding the standards of living of different socio-economic groups is a particularly difficult exercise. This shall also be the case, of course, of attempts to establish the impact of credit programs on final beneficiaries (Rhyne). Within the case of structural adjustment efforts, in any case, the outcome depends strongly on the initial conditions and on the categories of policies adopted. In any case, regardless of whether the observed poverty outcomes regarding the 1980s stemmed from past policies which militated against growth or from the adjustment policies that inevitably followed as the earlier strategies failed (Morley), there is no doubt that most low-income place governments and worldwide donors have been increasingly concerned with poverty alleviation. There exists 3 dimensions to this preoccupation. A first kind of concern relates to the need to achieve growth with equity over the long term. This requires policies and programs that foster the participation regarding the poor within the process of economic growth, by creating employment opportunities and by increasing their access to income-generating assets; and by raising the productivity of their assets, most physical and person (Grootaert and Kanbur). We know that, if efficiently provided, financial services shall play an important role in this task of incorporating (some of) the poor to processes of economic growth in most poor countries. A 2nd kind of concern relates to the need to mitigate the transitional price of adjustment for the highest many vulnerable groups of society. We know formal financial services can play a very limited role in this effort, if any. Other fiscal mechanisms give a more cost-effective approach to assist those unfortunate who have no productive opportunities and, therefore, no debt capacity. The use of credit in this case carries an excessive corporate price and is with no problems counterproductive, as one should not need to burden the unviable with more debt they cannot repay (Adams). In dealing with these (poverty) issues it is always difficult to bridge the gap between moral obligations, calling for private and public charity, on the one hand, and the economic requirements that should improve the lot regarding the poor, on the other (Schultz). It appears, nevertheless, that financial services can hold a sustainable economic role only within the 2nd case. In this case it is our desire that to encourage more players in informalfinancial services, any place and regulating authorities need to relax some requirements on governance and prudential issues when the opportunities for improvement do exist. To understand howcome this is the case, one wants to appreciate the nature of finance and the importance of its economic contributions as distant as economic development, particularly poverty reduction is concerned. 4.0   FUNCTIONS OF FINANCE  The financial system is a key component regarding the institutional infrastructure that is compulsory for the efficient procedure of all markets. The highest many important contribution regarding the financial system is its ability to induce a larger volume and foster a greater degree of integration regarding the markets for provision of goods and services, factors of production, and other assets. This expansion of markets is a precondition for powerful processes of division of labor and specialization, greater competition, the use of technological technologies, and the exploitation of economies of scale and of economies of scope. As already noted by Adam Smith, these are the processes that increase the productivity of available resources and lead to economic growth. With economic growth there exists multiplier effects that spill off to poverty reduction. The expansion and integration of markets is achieved through the provision of monetization services and the efficient management regarding the payments system, the development of services of intermediation between surplus and deficit economics agents, and the establishment of opportunities for the accumulation of stores of value, the management of liquidity, and the transformation, sharing, pooling, and diversification of risk (Long). Particularly important are the services of financial intermediation, which transfer purchasing power from agents with resources in excess of those wanted to take advantage of their own (internal) opportunities (surplus agents, for example savers), to those with better opportunities but not enough resources of their own (deficit agents, for example investors). This is critical for financial inclusiveness. By creating this division of labor between savers and investors possible, financial intermediaries channel resources from producers, activities, and regions with a limited growth potential to those where a more rapid expansion of output is possible. Since there always are more economic agents who claim that they have superior uses for resources than there is purchasing power available, financial markets should contribute to the selection regarding the greatest likely uses of resources. These markets should possibly release monitoring services, ensuring that funds are profitably used, as promised, and they can contribute to the enforcement of contracts, creating sure that the people who have borrowed repay the loans (Stiglitz).  This is where regulators for example central banks return into play. Subsequent to all, finance is about promises to pay within the future that are expected to be fulfilled. If this is not handled properly the consequences are disastrous, like the current economic crisis that has its roots in poor regulation regarding the financial sector. The conditions of such repayment influence, in turn, who bears what risks.  We cannot sufficiently emphasize the extent to which the efficient provision of financial services is extremely critical for the procedure regarding the economy at large. Due to the fact that financial markets essentially influence the allocation of resources, Stiglitz has compared them to the “brain” regarding the entire economic system, the central locus of decision making: if they fail. . .the performance regarding the entire economic system should be impaired. Howcome this is the case is a complex question, but if it is indeed so, there is clearly a primary corporate interest at stake here. Most governments have recognized this and many have gone to extremes sequential to prevent a collapse of their e&l insurance systems. Frequently, however, while recognizing but (mis)understanding their powers, governments have intervened in financial markets, within the pursuit of a varied section of worthy nonfinancial objectives, but with negative consequences. We need to ponder through as regulators that is why to mitigate this competing wants of positive and negative consequences when coming up with financial inclusion vision. 5.0   FINANCE AND POVERTY: LESSONS FROM THE PAST  A good no. regarding the initiatives to directly assist the poor with financial services (may) fall below this category of unsuccessful interventions. In considering such interventions, moreover, a key question to address is their potential price in terms regarding the reduced efficiency regarding the financial system at large. This is a price that it may be worth enduring, if the expected benefits were sufficiently large. Unfortunately, this is typically not the case, provided the very nature of financial markets. According to Gonzalez-Vega this is one regarding the highest many important lessons learned from earlier attempts to use formal financial markets to ostensibly promote specific activities, to compensate producers for other repressive policies, to free them from the grip of moneylenders, or to redistribute income towards the poor (Gonzalez-Vega 1993). The subsidized interest rates and administrative loan allocations through targeted credit programs, used for these purposes, did not displace informal sources of financial services and hardly promoted anything. They only redistributed income, but in reverse, from poor to wealthy (Gonzalez-Vega 1984). So, despite the greatest of intentions, they frequently turned out to be harmful for the specific segments regarding the population (marginal clientele) they had been set out to help. Like a country, that is why we need a concise visionary action to stay away from redistribution of income from the poor to the rich. This is common where commercial lenders together with the high pegged interest rates are targeting the poor exploitatively.







These outcomes are well known and have been extensively documented for dozens of countries (Adams et al.). Too many effort was spent in mini farmer credit programs, for example, to obtain meager results. The primary objective of increasing the farmers' access to formal credit was poorly met and a reduction within the price of borrowing was achieved only for a little larger borrowers in most poor countries. Despite artificially little interest rates, formal credit did not grow to non-pricey for mini rural producers and most credit portfolios became concentrated in a little hands.  Even in stagnant economies, nevertheless, finance plays a role in consumption smoothing. This role is frequently performed well by informal financial arrangements (Udry). More importantly, these government-sponsored credit programs distracted attention from technological innovation, infrastructure development, and person capital formation, which directly increase the productivity of resources. Finance, instead, can only contribute to this goal indirectly, by creating it likely for some to take advantage regarding the opportunities created by those other growth-inducing processes. Within the absence of such opportunities, however, there is only a limited role for finance to play. There is an increasing body of evidence confirming that economic growth and reductions in poverty leave paw in hand. Clearly, a substantial improvement in living standards requires economic growth (Biggs et al.). Further, securing full participation regarding the poor in such process is a long-term effort and it involves improving their employability, expanding the educational opportunities for their children, improving the performance of labor markets, creating a hospitable environment for their productive activities and many more. An efficient provision regarding the financial services that they demand is component (but only a part) of all of this process. So, to the question “Can financial services be used to assist the poor in improving their lot?” the answer is “only when finance is allowed to do what finance is supposed to do.” That is, only when: (a)        finance allows a transfer of purchasing power from uses with little to uses with high marginal rates of return; (b)        finance contributes to more efficient inter-temporal decisions about saving, the accumulation of assets, and investment; (c)        finance creates likely a fewer costly management of liquidity and accumulation of stores of value; and (d)        finance offers better ways to deal together with the risks implicit in economic activities. Otherwise, financial interventions (such as the early subsidized and targeted credit programs) are a weak instrument to achieve different, non-financial objectives and frequently lead to unexpectedly negative outcomes (Gonzalez-Vega, 1994). This section should be summarized together with the proposition that many components are wanted for the poor to return out of poverty and that credit is only two of them. Credit is an important ingredient, but it is not even the highest many important one. Financial services play the key role of facilitating the work of growth-promoting forces, but only when the opportunities exist. In this case the poor also need saving facilities as it is one regarding the highest many important ways of storing their value. That is why poor countries should encourage deposit receiving MFIs for this objective to be fully met. 6.0   LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT LOANS AND DEPOSITS As alluded to above, a 2nd important lesson learned from accumulated skills development is that, between financial services, credit is not the only one that is important for the poor. In particular, deposit facilities give valuable services for liquidity management and for the accumulation of stores of price by poor firm-households. Researchers are always surprised by the intensity regarding the demand for deposit facilities within the rural regions of very poor countries (Gonzalez-Vega et al.). According Robinson, to satisfaction of this demand was a distinctive feature of programs that have been successful in delivering financial services to the poor (Robinson). An outstanding example is the unit desa program regarding the Bank Rakyat Indonesia, with over 12,000,000 mini depositors for only over 2,000,000 mini borrowers (Patten and Rosengard). Thus, while not all producers demand loans and, between those in need the majority wants saving facilities. Between others, we need to emphasize the importance of payments services, particularly for remittances and other cash transfers In this regard financial inclusion should be approached in a holistic manner. We fully agree that a payments service is another important service for the poor. That is why payment system should collaborate well with saving and provision of credit for the full attainment of financial inclusion. Empirical evidence clearly demonstrates that the poor not ever demand credit all regarding the time, most (if not all) economic agents demand deposit and other facilities for liquidity management and reserve accumulation, all regarding the time. A third lesson from direct skills development is that the demand for credit is not just a demand for loanable funds. Finance is intimately linked to inter-temporal decisions, and in this sense it plays a critical role not only in savings and investment processes but also in dealing together with the lack of synchronization between income generating (production) and spending activities (consumption and input use decisions), as well. Finance shall also be closely associated with risk management. It facilitates the accumulation of reserves for precautionary reasons (to be can survive emergencies) and for speculative purposes (to be can take advantage of unexpected future opportunities). For this, being creditworthy is critical. Being creditworthy is equivalent to possessing a credit reserve: poor people not ever necessarily need a loan now; they need the opportunity to obtain one, if and when they need it (Baker). They need this potential access to a loan to be reliable, to result in a timely and flexible disbursement of funds, to be always there. According to studies finding, due to the fact that the informal sources of credit do release these opportunities, poor people are reluctant to substitute formal sources of funds, no reason how subsidized, for the flexible and reliable informal financial arrangements that have served them well over the years. Thus, what matters is not just access to loanable funds (credit) but the development of an established credit relationship. This, in turn, implies a sense of permanency regarding the financial institution. A fourth lesson learned, in this connection, is that a financial intermediary cannot be restricted to credit provision alone but to institutional framework support. 7.0   INSTITUTIONAL VIABILITY AND THE POOR With every program we have learned that the highest many severe deficiency regarding the earlier interventions to give financial services to the poor was the lack of institutional viability regarding the organizations that were created for that purpose. For instance, howcome does viability reason so much?  The concern with viability springs first from a clean recognition regarding the scarcity of resources. If resources are limited, without self-sufficient financial institutions there is little hope for reaching the numbers of poor firm-households that are potential borrowers and depositors. The amounts compulsory are beyond the ability and willingness of governments and donors to give them (Otero and Rhyne).  We therefore, as poor nations need to guard against weak prospective financial services within the system to compliment government and donors’ efforts. The alternative to viable organizations are expensive, unviable quasi-fiscal programs that reach only a selected little beneficiaries. Thus, viability matters the highest many from this equity perspective: to be can reach higher than just a privileged few. Moreover, if the objective were just a one-time (transitory) injection of funds, then lump-sum transfers are always a more efficient method of accomplishing this. If, on the other hand, sustainability is important, then the viability regarding the financial organization matters. Further, in addition to being fiscally feasible, the highest many important contribution of a concern with institutional viability is that it elicits appropriate incentives between all the participants in financial transactions. Thus, for example, while poor loan recovery rapidly destroys viability, an image of viability improves repayment discipline. A reputation like a good borrower in an established intermediary-client relationship is a more valuable intangible asset if the financial institution is expected to be permanent rather than transitory. When this intangible asset is sufficiently valuable, it elicits punctual repayment. When the organization's survival is questioned, on the other hand, default follows in stampede, and institutional breakdown becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Viability matters when repayment matters. Therefore, there is tough need to make sure that that borrowers hold a good credit culture. This is where a tough credit reference service is imperatively wanted to enhance good credit culture.    In this way, a concern with viability creates it likely to identify one method how interest rates and default rates are linked. Too little interest rates that cause intermediary losses are perceived by borrowers as signals of lack of permanency and thus delinquency follows.. Moreover, within the similar to method that very high interest rates shall induce adverse selection (Stiglitz and Weiss), too little rates tend to attract rent seekers who eventually default (Gonzalez-Vega 1993). Thus, most too high and too little interest rates shall reduce expected intermediary profits through higher expected default rates. There is need to strike a balance, to make sure that real interest rates strike a balance As another example, the targeting of loan uses, irrelevant due to the fact that regarding the fungibility of funds (Von Pischke and Adams), basically increases most lender and borrower transaction costs and reduces the quality regarding the services supplied by the intermediary and thus lowers the price regarding the intermediary-client relationship. In summary, targeting hurts viability in multiple ways. It reduces the scope for portfolio diversification in already highly specialized lenders. It limits the lender's degrees of freedom in screening loan applicants, and it reduces incentives for vigorous loan collection, shifting accountability for default from the lender to the donor that conditions the availability of funds to their use for specific targets (Aguilera-Alfred and Gonzalez-Vega).  Findings reveal that compliance together with the targeting becomes imperatively difficult, for an extended time many donors ignored this potential impact of targeting on delinquency, but they were very surprised when rampant default destroyed the institutions that had been (ab)used to with no problems channel donor funds.  Deposit mobilization, on the other hand, is not an easy task. It requires an appropriate organizational design, liability management techniques, and prudential supervision to protect depositors. You that is why want a tough and resilient regulator. Finally, deposit mobilization shall also be intimately linked to the importance of institutional viability. Deposits give facts to the lender regarding the potential borrowers, make a basis of mutual trust, and facilitate the accumulation of a below payment that can give like a deductible in any future loan contract. Deposits contribute, therefore, to the solution of difficult facts problems frequently encountered in financial markets. Moreover, well deposit mobilization creates an image of institutional viability that promotes repayment. Thus, while donor-funded loans shall not be repaid, those funded together with the neighbor's deposits are (Aguilera-Alfred andGonzalez-Vega). Most importantly, depositors make institutional independence from the whims of donors and politicians; they shield the financial organization from political intrusion (Poyo, Gonzalez-Vega and Aguilera-Alfred). In general, deposit mobilization contributes to sustainability and to an organizational environment (corporate culture) where permanency becomes an important (compatible) incentive to attract and retain competent managers and induce the agency's staff to behave in ways compatible together with the viability of organization. For them, the price of their relationship together with the organization increases when deposits are an important source of funds. This encourages correct decisions and effort (Chaves 1993). 8.0   FORMAL AND INFORMAL FINANCE Against this backdrop as poor countries formulate financial inclusion vision and strategy they need to recapitulate the following into consideration that: (a)        The poor need higher than just financial services; the non-financial components of growth and development matter; (b)        The poor need higher than just credit; deposit facilities shall reason even more. (c)        The poor need higher than just loanable funds; they need a permanent, flexible and reliable credit relationship; (d)        In consequence, the poor need viable, efficient, profitable, well-managed financial intermediaries with which to establish these permanent relationships. 9.0              OBSERVATIONS One important more lesson increasingly learned over the past decades is that informal financial arrangements are pervasive and very successful in providing multiple (some) categories of financial services between the poor (Bouman and Hospes). They can be timely, reliable, and levy little transaction costs on their clients, mostly for loans of mini amounts and at brief terms. The price and importance of these informal financial arrangements have been increasingly recognized and visions of exploitation have been replaced by attempts to neither replicate their features or link informal lenders to local financial networks (Adams and Fitchett). But, as Hugo Pirela has asked “if this is the case, howcome should more (semi-formal and formal) financial intermediaries be wanted to do a job that indigenous, informal arrangements are already doing to well?” The fact is that, despite their valuable contributions, informal financial arrangements suffer from multiple limitations. These shortcomings stem from the very features that make informal transactions competitive within first place. They can be grounded within the regional economy and are thereby limited hence the need to formalize them in shape of microfinance institutions. Moreover, successful finance requires inputs for screening loan applicants (information management for creditworthiness evaluation and loan approval), for monitoring borrowers, and for the efficient creation and enforcement of contracts. These costs are a function of distance (geographic, occupational, and ethnic) and of feasible technologies used to make these services. In addition, alternative technological arrangements result in specific comparative advantages within the provision of financial services in specific market niches. The decision of appropriate technology thus becomes critical. Many technological progress has taken location within the region of microfinance (Christen, Rhyne, and Vogel). The key to success is to creation an intervention that is properly dimensioned to the volume regarding the market and compatible together with the nature regarding the clientele (Chaves and Gonzalez-Vega). General banking technology, for example, is prohibitively expensive for loans to the poor in real terms. Most lender and borrower transaction costs are too high in this case. Moreover, as the poor are so heterogeneous, so are the financial services that they demand, creating opportunities for different categories of intermediaries. Commercial banks may, of course, adopt more information-intensive technologies than those that rely on general collateral; that is, embark on “downgrading” strategies (Krahnen and Schmidt). This adaptation of commercial banks’ technology of extending loans is clearly receiving a centre stage in Zambia. We have seen very many of banks extending microfinance services to the public, but this is explicitly available to the elite. Consequently there exists primary advantages in creating use of banks as intermediaries, to reach marginal clientele they need a technological revolution. Other non-bank organizations shall possess comparative advantages in facts and contract enforcement between this clientele. They shall eventually be “upgraded” to grow to more like banks. In neither case, the challenge is to bring together the people who have the informational and enforcement advantages (usually regional agents) and those with sufficient resources and willingness. Appropriate technology is clearly a compulsory condition for reaching the poor with sustainable financial services. It is not a sufficient condition, however. While policies, procedures and technologies matter, policies shall not be enacted, procedures shall not be revised, and technologies shall not be adopted, unless it is in someone's interest to do so. Within the end, all decisions are created by individuals, who pursue their own objective functions, provided existing constraints. Institutions constrain lone behavior, define property rights and incentives, and embody the rules regarding the play (North). Organizational creation matters very many due to the fact that lone choices are induced and/or constrained by the structure of incentives within the organization. Organizational creation is critical due to the fact that it influences behavior and behavior influences performance. If what matters is not just loanable funds but viable organizations, emphasis on designing efficient and viable organizations is critical. The dilemma is that a flood of donor and government funds tends to destroy adequate organizational designs. Due to the fact that wealth constraints matter, how to overcome those constraints without at the similar to time destroying the intermediary involved is a primary challenge. It seems that the highest many difficult remaining question within the provision of financial services to the poor is thus the creation of organizations together with the correct structure of incentives and governance rules (Chaves 1994). As this depends so many on the structure of property rights regarding the organization, there exists serious questions regarding the extent to which intermediaries with diffused property rights structures (such as the old public development banks and the new NGOs) or with conflicting governance rules (such as credit cooperatives) should be can generate sustainable financial intermediation. The greatest challenge for the progress of finance for the poor, therefore, is within the institutional creation of such organizations. This is, according to Krahnen and Schmidt, the highest many promising and critical region for future donor assistance. Moreover, due to the fact that of multiple limitations of locally-based financial arrangements (limited opportunities for risk diversification and intermediation), appropriate links regarding the regional intermediaries to the aggregate financial system should be established, sequential to increase the viability of enforcement-effective and informationally-advantaged agents, which shall suffer from local, covariant, systemic risks and from limited opportunities for intermediation between surplus and deficit units. Ultimately, what matters is the development of financial processes and networks (e.g., new ways of economic organization). As markets grow and institutions are developed, formality shall increase (although informality shall not disappear), and the introduction of technological institutions should be required. For this, appropriate policies, cost-effective technologies, and viable organizational designs shall still be needed. 10.0          CONCLUSION That is why the vision regarding the poor countries in promoting this concept of financial inclusion in poverty reduction need to focus on the concerns about poverty raised in this paper;the relationship between financial inclusion and poverty, functions of finance, finance and poverty: lessons from the past, lessons learned about loans and deposits, institutional viability and the poor, formal and informal finance and lastly the relevant observations created in this paper.  REFERENCES Aaron, Henry (1978), Politics and the Professors: The Best Society in Perspective, Washington,D.C.: Brookings Institution. Adams, Dale W (1994), “Altruistic or Production Finance?: A Donor's Dilemma,” Economics and Sociology Occasional Cardboard No. 2150, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University. Adams, Dale W and Delbert A. Fitchett (eds.), (1992), Informal Finance in Low-Income Countries, Boulder, Co.: Westview Press. Adams, Dale W, Douglas H. Graham, and J.D. Von Pischke (eds.), (1984), Undermining Rural Development with Non-pricey Credit, Boulder, Co.: Westview Press. Aguilera-Alfred, Nelson and Claudio Gonzalez-Vega (1993), “A Multinomial Logit Analysis of Loan Targeting and Repayment at the Agricultural Development Bank regarding the Dominican Republic,” Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 53: 55-64. Baker, Chester (1973), “Role of Credit within the Economic Development of Mini Farm Agriculture,” Mini Farmer Credit Analytical Papers, Washington, D.C.: Agency for Worldwide Development Spring Review of Mini Farmer Credit. Biggs, Tyler, Merilee S. Grindle and Donald R. Snodgrass (1988), “The Informal Sector, Policy Reform, and Structural Transformation,” in Jerry Jenkins (ed.), Beyond the Informal Sector. Within the Excluded in Developing Countries, San Francisco, Ca.: Institutefor Contemporary Studies. Bouman, F.J.A. and Otto Hospes (eds.) (1994), Financial Landscapes Reconstructed. The Fine Art of Mapping Development, Boulder, Co.: Westview Press. Chaves, Rodrigo A. (1994), “The Behavior and Performance of Credit Cooperatives: An Analysis of Cooperative Governance Rules,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University. Chaves, Rodrigo A. and Claudio Gonzalez-Vega (1994b), “The creation of Successful Rural Financial Intermediaries: Evidence from Indonesia,” World Development, forthcoming. Christen, Robert Peck, Elisabeth Rhyne and Robert C. Vogel (1994), “Maximizing the Outreach of Microenterprise Finance: The Emerging Lessons of Successful Programs,” Washington, D.C.: IMCC, unpublished report. Danziger, Sheldon H. and Daniel H. Weinberg (1986), “Introduction,” in Sheldon H. Danzigerand Daniel H. Weinberg (eds.), Fighting Poverty. What Works and What Doesn't,Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Gonzalez-Vega Claudio (1984), “Cheap Agricultural Credit: Redistribution in Reverse,” in Dale W Adams, Douglas H. Graham, and J.D. Von Pischke (eds.), Undermining Rural Development with Non-pricey Credit, Boulder, Co.: Westview Press. Gonzalez-Vega, Claudio (1993), “From Policies, to Technologies, to Organizations: The Evolution of The Ohio State University Vision of Rural Financial Markets,” Economics and Sociology Occasional Cardboard No. 2062, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University. Gonzalez-Vega, Claudio (1994), “Stages within the Evolution of Thought on Rural Finance. A Vision from The Ohio State University,” Economics and Sociology Occasional Cardboard No. 2134, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University. Gonzalez-Vega, Claudio, Jose Alfredo Guerrero, Archibaldo Vasquez and Cameron Thraen (1992), “La Demanda por Servicios de Depósito en las Regions Rurales de la República Dominicana,”in Claudio Gonzalez-Vega (ed.), República Dominicana: Mercados Financieros Rurales y Mouilización de Depósitos, Santo Domingo: The Ohio State University.   Grootaert, Christiaan and Ravi Kanbur (1990), “Policy-Oriented Analysis of Poverty and the Corporate Dimensions of Structural Adjustment,” Washington, D.C.: The World Bank SDAWorking Paper. Harrington, Michael (1962), The Other America: Poverty within the United States, New York:MacMillan. Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling (1976), “Theory regarding the Firm, Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305-360. Johnson, Lyndon (1964), “Letter of Transmittal,” in Economic Report regarding the President, Washington, D.C.: GPO. Jordan, Jerry L. (1993), “Community Lending and Economic Development,” Economic Commentary, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, November. Krahnen, Jan Pieter and Reinhard H. Schmidt (1994), Development Finance as Institution Building. An Special Approach to Poverty-Oriented Banking, Boulder, Co.: Westview Press. Christen, Robert Peck, Elisabeth Rhyne and Robert C. Vogel (1994), “Maximizing the Outreach of Microenterprise Finance: The Emerging Lessons of Successful Programs,” Washington, D.C.: IMCC, unpublished report. Danziger, Sheldon H. and Daniel H. Weinberg (1986), “Introduction,” in Sheldon H. Danziger and Daniel H. Weinberg (eds.), Fighting Poverty. What Works and What Doesn't,Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Gonzalez-Vega Claudio (1984), “Cheap Agricultural Credit: Redistribution in Reverse,” in Dale W Adams, Douglas H. Graham, and J.D. Von Pischke (eds.), Undermining Rural Development with Non-pricey Credit, Boulder, Co.: Westview Press. Gonzalez-Vega, Claudio (1993), “From Policies, to Technologies, to Organizations: The Evolution of The Ohio State University Vision of Rural Financial Markets,” Economics and Sociology Occasional Cardboard No. 2062, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University. Gonzalez-Vega, Claudio (1994), “Stages within the Evolution of Thought on Rural Finance. A Vision from The Ohio State University,” Economics and Sociology Occasional Cardboard No. 2134, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University. Gonzalez-Vega, Claudio, Jose Alfredo Guerrero, Archibaldo Vasquez and Cameron Thraen(1992), “La Demanda por Servicios de Depósito en las Regions Rurales de la República Dominicana,”in Claudio Gonzalez-Vega (ed.), República Dominicana: Mercados Financieros Rurales y Mouilización de Depósitos, Santo Domingo: The Ohio State University.   Grootaert, Christiaan and Ravi Kanbur (1990), “Policy-Oriented Analysis of Poverty and the Corporate Dimensions of Structural Adjustment,” Washington, D.C.: The World Bank SDA Working Paper. Harrington, Michael (1962), The Other America: Poverty within the United States, New York:MacMillan. Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling (1976), “Theory regarding the Firm, Managerial Behavior,Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305-360. Johnson, Lyndon (1964), “Letter of Transmittal,” in Economic Report regarding the President, Washington, D.C.: GPO. Jordan, Jerry L. (1993), “Community Lending and Economic Development,” Economic Commentary,Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, November. Krahnen, Jan Pieter and Reinhard H. Schmidt (1994), Development Finance as Institution Building.A New Approach to Poverty-Oriented Banking, Boulder, Co.: Westview Press. Robinson, Marguerite S. (1994), “Financial Intermediation at the Regional Level: Lessons from Indonesia,” Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Institute for Worldwide Development, Development Discussion Cardboard No. 482. Robinson, Marguerite S. (1994), “Savings Mobilization and Microenterprise Finance: The Indonesian Experience,” in Maria Otero and Elisabeth Rhyne (eds.), The New World of Microenterprise Finance. Building Well Financial Institutions for the Poor, West Hartford, Conn.: Kumarian Press. Shultz, Theodore W. (1992), “Foreword,” in Tarsicio Costañeda, Combatting Poverty. Innovative Corporate Reforms in Chile During the 1980s, San Francisco, Ca.: Worldwide Center for Economic Growth. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1993), “The Role regarding the State in Financial Markets,” Proceeding regarding the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics.   Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Andrew Weiss (1981), “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information,”American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 3: 393-410. Udry, Christopher (1990), “Credit Markets in Northern Nigeria: Credit as Insurance in a Rural Economy,” The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 251-71. Von Pischke, J.D. (1991), Finance at the Frontier. Debt Capacity and the Role of Credit in thePrivate Economy, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.   Von Pischke, J.D. and Dale W Adams (1983), “Fungibility and the Creation and Evaluation of Agricultural Credit Project,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 62, No.4, November.